Monday, October 25, 2010

Tower Hamlets: A bit of a flashback

Tower Hamlets Councillor Rachel Saunders gives her personal take on what has gone wrong with the local Mayoral election.  Hat tip Labour List (and Unmesh Desai!)

"Thursday night, the night Labour lost Tower Hamlets, felt like a bit of a flashback. The venue was different, York Hall instead of Canary Wharf’s Winter Gardens, but Oliur Rahman and Rania Khan were doing V for Victory signs, hard working Labour activists were miserable and Ken Clark (London Labour's regional director) was at the front of the room looking grumpy.

One difference though – in 2006 I went up to a couple of Labour councillors and gave them a piece of my mind for working as a part of a group of Labour councillors who were making deals with Respect and others to save their own skins and knife councillors they disliked. This time Lutfur Rahman was victorious, but no longer in the Labour Party, at last openly supported by Respect and by others who travel through political parties as it suits them.

This election result came after a messy summer, where two separate panels made up of NEC and regional board members decided not to shortlist Lutfur Rahman, but he got on the shortlist through an appeal. Having previously declined to shortlist him, NEC members chose not to accept his nomination by the local party, and voted instead to impose the sitting council leader Helal Abbas.

Abbas is a decent man with an impressive personal story. From his leadership of the local squatters movement in the 1980s, standing up for Bengali families in desperate need who were excluded from social housing, to his record as the first Bangladeshi council leader, Abbas was the best candidate to steer us through the difficult times ahead. Why did he lose?

It will take a bit longer than a day to articulate what went on in the Bangladeshi community over the past few weeks and months. It is important to be clear that our greatest campaign leaders and activists were Bangladeshi, and that Lutfur presented himself as “Real Labour”, exactly like Respect before him – the bonds that tie our party to the east end of London remain strong, and our opponents only win by impersonating us.

I think our loss has two root causes. One, despite London region intending to run a short selection process and leave us a long summer to campaign, the cock ups and conspiracies meant we must have appeared to our electorate to spend the entire summer warring amongst ourselves. Combined with the London mayoral selection and leadership elections that many of us were involved in, we can’t blame our electorate for feeling like we lost our focus on what should really matter. We did continue to run campaign sessions several times a week, but not everyone will have seen us. This will have contributed to the very low turnout.

Secondly, Lutfur’s narrative was up and running before our story had its boots on. Lutfur presented himself as a victim of the evil Labour Party machine. He had much of the Bengali media behind him, and the intervention of Ken Livingstone, who turned up a few days before polling day and did a walkabout with Lutfur that the BBC were available to film, meant that Labour Party process was all anyone could talk about. Added to this was a smear campaign more filthy than I could have imagined – and I’ve seen a few nasty ones since Respect came into town.

Make no mistake though, there is no difference between the coalition of people that came within one councillor of toppling us in 2006 and the people who managed it on Thursday. Previously Ken Livingstone came to Tower Hamlets to slate Jim Fitzpatrick MP and give Galloway a hug, this time he slated Abbas and hugged Lutfur. Siraj of Clifton restaurant was a supporter of Galloway then and he’s a supporter of Lutfur now. Oliur Rahman, the first Respect councillor and opponent of Jim Fitzpatrick in 2005, who has been a member of four political groups in as many years (SWP/Respect, Left List, Labour, Lutfur), was crowing at the Labour defeat.

The selection process was a mess, but the NEC were absolutely right to stop Lutfur being the Labour candidate.

We defeated Respect convincingly in May 2010, and we’ll do it again. We’ll do it in exactly the same way. Again, we have a wave of new activists who are disgusted at what they have seen and want to defeat it. Again, we have excellent local organisation and hard working talented activists and councillors. We’re stronger than before, with two excellent Labour MPs. We’ll win back the hearts and minds of the people of Tower Hamlets through demonstrating that we understand their concerns, and that only Labour can represent the whole of our community.

This time we’ll have to stand up for them in opposition at the Town Hall. If you oppose the politics of hatred and division that Galloway stood for in Tower Hamlets - before we drummed him out - then stand with us".

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

next ken will be larging up Lee Jasper

oh didnt he have issues in the last Mayoral election which cost us

Ken look we backed you as the best candidate

but this is no 1980s re run

The Tories will have you backing Sharia Law and Berkas down in Bethnal green

unlike Respect We are a secular party

Nick Venedi said...

I don't know much about the detail of this but I am amazed that Ken Livingstone has diviated from the party line again. I am an advocate for freedom of expression but insist that when a formal position is reached within a party the rest of us follow the line. I supported Ken bfore and will do at the next Mayor election but he is not above the party and he must comply with what is agreed collectively otherwise we can all be doing our own thing and have little secterian dishonest groupings dictating policy, a recipe for electoral defeat!

Anonymous said...

Spot on Nick

Tower Hamlet born and bred said...

I was born and brought up in tower Hamlet, and am a labour activist. Rachel a councillor fo 2 years has got it wrong. Lutfur is real labour. He is the only one who stood up for the peopel of tower Hamlet. And what the right wing element within the Labour party did to him to get him out because ehe challenged a corrupt and right wing system is frankly quite disgusting. And rachel should be ashamed of herself when she knows this to be true. The real problem i feel is we have had a wave of imposed councillors inthe borough since 2002 whom have no connection to the people in Tower Hmalet, parachuted in to rule over the people in partnerhsip with old time docile and submissive bengali politicans whom are dirven by personal interest. But if democracy was allowed back in Tower hamlet Labour party were local people select their councillors this could have been avoided as councillors would have had to coem from grassroot community.

RESPECT only had a chance in Tower Hamlet becuase people were fed up with the new Labour politics.

Lutfur came onto the scene two years ago, and began to give us hope. Teh new wave of younger Bangladeshi politicans driven by community needs was a welcome relief. And Lutfur represented that new dawn and the new future were community was put before Right wing New Labour- Tory agendas and politics.

Tower Hamlet said...

I was born and brought up in tower Hamlet, and am a labour activist. Rachel a councillor fo 2 years has got it wrong. Lutfur is real labour. He is the only one who stood up for the peopel of tower Hamlet. And what the right wing element within the Labour party did to him to get him out because ehe challenged a corrupt and right wing system is frankly quite disgusting. And rachel should be ashamed of herself when she knows this to be true. The real problem i feel is we have had a wave of imposed councillors inthe borough since 2002 whom have no connection to the people in Tower Hmalet, parachuted in to rule over the people in partnerhsip with old time docile and submissive bengali politicans whom are dirven by personal interest. But if democracy was allowed back in Tower hamlet Labour party were local people select their councillors this could have been avoided as councillors would have had to coem from grassroot community.

RESPECT only had a chance in Tower Hamlet becuase people were fed up with the new Labour politics.

Lutfur came onto the scene two years ago, and began to give us hope. Teh new wave of younger Bangladeshi politicans driven by community needs was a welcome relief. And Lutfur represented that new dawn and the new future were community was put before Right wing New Labour- Tory agendas and politics.

In terms of Kens actions, he came just before the election day becuase he knew Lutfur was going to win, everyone knew. And his involvement made it a labour win which Labour can now celebrate if the right wing element can put their pride away and accept that centre left politics in tower Hamlet is what people want, and Lutfur will deliver that as he had over the last two years.

John Gray said...

"tower hamlet" is "Sultana Begum" on Facebook.

Not sure if she is a real person.

I let others respond.

Fed up of Tower Hamlets bigots said...

"tower hamlet born" and tower hamlets are obviously the same creatures. She typifies all what is wrong about Tower Hamlets politics.

Nasty, ignorant bigots who just slag people off and who are too thick to understand that their true id will be found out.

Anonymous said...

the bitter irony of "tower hamlets born" is that she is advancing the same racist arguments against "new comers" that were used against the Bangladeshi community.

Rachael said...

Hi John,

Sultana Begum is real. Respect activist, then involved in Left List after the SWP split from Respect, briefly a Labour member until she left to support Lutfur. A shame-she's always been quite nice to my face!

John Gray said...

Hi Rachel

I've come across a few as well who before this campaign have been nice as pie to me in person but have since turned out to be pretty vile keyboard warriers.

Hey Ho!

Anonymous said...

I'm not part of the bangaledeshi community and and am a party member,I found the whole nominations process shambolic and frankly outraged at the NECs actions, the result was the one I and many other non alligned party members wanted and supported,don't delude yourselves with thinking this was all a Respect conspiracy, you are missing the point. Maybe Ed will start to put into action the plan to return the party to more effective local control.

Irritated - Mile End

Anonymous said...

I'm not part of the bangaledeshi community and and am a party member...

Well so am I

So you want relgious bigots running the council in tower hamlets then?

Irritated - Bow

Anonymous said...

Sorry, but Labour ran a dirty and Islamophobic campaign and this really pissed off the local community, which is stupid because they will come to the defence of anything and anyone who smears them or attacks them on basis of religion, as Oona King found out to her cost.

I would have voted for Labour otherwise but was so disgusted by the smear allegations denigrating Muslims and linking them with extremism here in Tower hamlets that I voted for Rahman instead.

Anonymous said...

you don't know what you are talking about. Oona King lost her seat because she was black and a women and attacked by racist respect for being jewish (racist lies about her giving money to the IDF and more racist lies trying to ban halel meat etc).

everyone knows the truth about what has happened. If Labour was Islamophobic they would have put Biggs in. There is no place for the vile community politics you have supported in Tower Hamlets but LR was welcome to your vote. We don't want it. Crawl back into your sewer.

Anonymous said...

11 November 2010 03:55

If the Tower Hamlets party members keep throwing out these wild unsubstantiated paranoid allegations about religious bigots taking over the council then Labour will eventually lose TH.

Anonymous said...

they are not wild or unsubstantiated. Everyone in Tower Hamlets politics knows it to be true. The only one paranoid is you. Voters will desert us unless we deal with it head on.