“A bad day for Rights at Work”

No Justice for agency workers I’m afraid. The European Union “Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council” (also known for some reason as Europe’s Social Affairs council) met yesterday. I posted on Wednesday about media reports that a deal had been struck.

Apparently enough member states had agreed to finally give agency workers in the EU employment rights and to put an end to a two tier “terms and conditions” workforce. Agency staff would be on broadly similar terms as permanent staff. There is majority voting on this issue.

However in a classic EU fudge – the decision has been put off again (I quote) “Having in mind the fact that this proposal is still very recent, as well as the sensitive nature of these directives to some member states and the importance of exploring all attempts to reach an agreement as large as possible before final decision, the Council agreed that the best option at this moment was to postpone a decision, in order to further pursue the dialogue”.

Naturally TUC General Secretary, Brendon Barber is furious “'This is a bad day for rights at work across Europe, but especially in the UK.'

It is very disappointing that there has been no progress on the agency working Directive. There is real anger among unions today that the UK Government played the pivotal role in blocking progress today on this modest measure to improve workplace justice. '

Contrary to business scare-mongering, this Directive would not stop agencies providing temporary staff to employers who need them. What it would have done was both make it more difficult for employers to undercut wages and conditions and help slow the growth of a two-tier workforce. But unions will not give up the campaign to deliver justice for agency workers......"

The next Council meeting is not until I think February next year. The T&G Unite have a good site on this matter.

OK we need to think on the next step forward. Agency workers rights is still a "Warwick agreement" and Labour Party manifesto commitment. How to lobby and pressure the government to do the decent thing next year?

“Protecting Future Pensions”: Conference for Trade Union Pension Trustees/Reps

The annual TUC “Trustee Network” Conference takes place on Friday 22 June 2007 at the Cass Business School, London, EC1Y. Keynote speakers are James Purnell MP, Minister of State for Pensions Reform (who took my photo with Tom and Nick Cohen last month), Paul Myners, Chairman, Guardian PLC and Chair, Low Pay Commission (my pension fund sacked him and his company, Gartmore, as its fund manager in 1994 – something he describes as the “worse day in his life” – a Joke BTW) and Brendan Barber, TUC General Secretary (photo with UNISON London region last week).

Seriously, this is the only Trade Union national meeting of member nominated trustees/representatives on pension schemes. Ordinary workers in this country actually own huge chunks of British and international capital via our pension schemes, life insurance policies and other collective investments (such as PEP’s, unit trusts, investment trusts). However, often we have little or even no influence over how this money is governed. Pensions are just deferred wages. We should be exercising our rights of ownership (as well as taking responsibility for what is done in our name).

The pressure group “Fair Pensions” describes how some of our money “is invested in companies that are attacking employees’ rights and fighting attempts to unionise. This can include the use of militias against trade unionists in South America to “Union-busting” in the UK. We need to use our investments to change some companies’ behaviour. Pension funds own almost a fifth of the stock market, but the vast majority of funds - including some that offer “ethical” options – make no effort to challenge this behaviour.

Responsibly-invested pension funds are already putting Wal-Mart under heavy pressure over its labour practices in the United States. In the UK, pension funds have successfully lobbied drug manufacturers to lower the cost of HIV treatments for southern Africa and persuaded companies to start tackling climate change.

Responsible investment is about using shareholder power to improve company behaviour, rather than avoiding certain industries, so it does not lower returns, and can improve financial performance by identifying the potential cost of corporate strategies that ignore legal, reputational and other risks”.

If you want an agenda and booking form contact Jayne Cranefield on 020 7467 1225 jcranefield@tuc.org.uk (normally a bit pricy – make sure that your pension fund or union pays). If you have a “funded” pension scheme (has actually investments rather than “pay as you go” UNISON and the TUC are running courses on pensions), check to see if you could be a member nominated trustee/representative. If you are already a trustee join the network

UPDATE: Download entry form from TUC

A May Day Evening with Ken

Last night after the march I went to the annual trade union, May Day reception, laid on by London Mayor, Ken Livingston, at City Hall, SE1. It was held in the “London Living Room” which is on the 9th floor of City Hall. It has brilliant views over central London and the Thames. There is an open air balcony and you can see for miles.

The place was packed (200 odd?) with the great and good of TIGMOO. Ken lived up to his reputation of being a good host, lots of lovely grub and a drink or two. There was a good presence from London UNISON (See picture with TUC General Secretary Brendan Barber).

Ken gave a speech first. Concentrating about the London Assembly elections next year (2008), the threat from the BNP and the lies that they tell (e.g. during the local council elections last year in Barking, the BNP spread the lie that Ken was giving £50,000 to every African who wanted to move to that area). He made a good point that there is a lot of cynicism amongst the public about what “politicians” say (I would agree to a point). However, many people will trust what their trade union and shop steward says. So if the union tells its members, don’t believe the rubbish that the fascists are putting out, members are more likely to pay attention. I think this is largely true.

Brendan gave a thought provoking speech about the role of trade unions and the way we have to adapt to our modern day society. Which I suppose was a lead to Tony Woodley, Joint Secretary of the brand new union UNITE which was born on May 1. UNITE merges the Transport & General (I use to be a member and shop steward) and Amicus (I also use to be a member). UNITE is now probably the biggest trade union in the UK. Tony is a fluent and natural speaker. You could see him even now as the former convenor in Vauxhall’s car plant, Ellesmere Port (which use to be a major employer where I grew up). It was interesting that he expressed regret that Ken was no longer a MP, since he would have had his support as a candidate to be the Labour Leader! Ken’s face beamed unabashed. However, I am certain he must play the game “what if” from time to time (don’t we all).

Due to UNITE, there are various rumours about what UNISON and the GMB will do in response. I teased the GMB Tower Hamlets branch secretary yesterday that UNISON and the GMB were about to merge. He replied “never in my life time, never in my life time!” He’s like me, a young chap (okay, okay – mid 40’s is now young). Maybe so. However, I do not expect there to be a stand alone “GMB” or “UNISON” in 5 years time. We live in interesting times. Why can’t we have single industry/service unions?

All in all, an excellent end to an excellent day. Tomorrow morning (taken day off), I am off with a car load of East London comrades to Thurrock, Essex to help out in the election. Good practice, since the BNP are standing in all their wards.

Good luck to all Labour candidates tomorrow.

Don't let Employers get away with Blaming Brown for Pension Cuts

Totally agree with this press release from Brendan Barber. Clearly, the Tory attack dogs are on the prowl. I agree that "Fat Cats" are more to blame than Brown. Check out top pensions blog (the only one?) Capital and Labour for more common sense about this and other issues.

"Don't let employers get away with blaming Brown for pension cuts TUC General Secretary Brendan Barber has hit out at those blaming changes in the way dividends are taxed introduced in Gordon Brown's first budget for the decline in occupational pensions.

Speaking to union officials at a meeting in Congress House, he said: 'Neither employers nor opposition politicians should be allowed to get away with blaming Gordon Brown for cuts in occupational pension schemes. When the tax rules were changed, pension funds were generally in surplus. Many companies had got used to long contributions holidays, and with typical UK short-termism had no plans for restarting contributions. Many companies used pension surpluses to make people redundant through early retirement. 'But when reality returned and employers started facing bills for their pension schemes once again, the retreat from quality schemes began.

Stock market pressures and longer life expectancies have caused far more difficulties than the tax change, which it should not be forgotten, was meant to encourage more long-term thinking in Britain's boardrooms and boost investment. 'But the bottom line is this. Many employers thought they could get away with cutting the pension of their staff, usually while gold plating those in the boardroom. And unsurprisingly they looked for someone else to shoulder the blame, and chose the Chancellor as their fall guy.

Ministers will need to brace themselves as employers who cut schemes in the next few years will inevitably blame the new pension settlement rather than own up to being mean. 'It is not that we are uncritical of the Chancellor. Unions have long called for state pensions to be linked to earnings, and although that principle has now been conceded we still want it to take place before 2012. But on the closure of occupational pensions the guilty men and women are not to be found in the Treasury.'