It is now clear that the Fire Brigade Union fear that that the proposed changes to their terms and conditions by Tory London Fire authority Chair,
Brian Coleman, was actually all about reducing the number of fire engines and firefighters - was pretty accurate.
Let us check out Tory blogger Iain Dale
here 1 November 2010 where he said "the FBU have used it to put about scare stories about future reductions in night cover or a possible reduction in fire appliances.
Coleman has said publicly on several occasions he will guarantee that neither of those will happen. But the union pretends not to hear".
Now check out the notorious toad of London City Hall late amendment to the London Fire budget
here that
"officers [should] explore, as part of the budget process, and report back to the Committee... on whether the Brigade needs all 27 of the fire appliances removed from stations during the current industrial action to be returned or whether there is an over-supply of appliances".
This would
result in 500 Job losses and a 16% reduction in the number of fire engines. Now it could be Coleman is just being his usual petty minded and vindictive self or the FBU fears were legitimate from
get go. You can guess my view.
Et tu, Red Tel? (in joke). Hat tip thingy Col. Roi.
