Ed responds to the disgusting story about his late father by the "Daily Hate". I wonder how many of these so called "journalists" have ever risked their lives fighting for this country?
(
Guardian) "Labour leader
Ed Miliband was engaged in a bitter personal and political battle with the
Daily Mail
last night, accusing it of smearing his father by asserting he was
unpatriotic even though he had fought in the second world war for
Britain against the Nazis.
Following discussions, the Mail's
editor Paul Dacre agreed to publish a very personal right of reply by
Miliband, rebutting claims in a piece published on Saturday asserting
Miliband's father, Ralph, was a Jewish Marxist who hated Britain and its
establishment.
The row has echoes of Miliband's decision to take on Rupert Murdoch's News International over phone hacking.
Ed
Miliband's father was a Jewish refugee who fled to Britain ahead of the
second world war and then fought for the Britain. The original Mail
article said Ralph Miliband had no love of Britain and, indeed, hated
the country.
In his piece published by the Mail on Tuesday,
Miliband asserted: "It was June 1944 and the Allies were landing in
Normandy. A 20-year-old man, who had arrived in Britain as a refugee
just four years earlier, was part of that fight. He was my father.
Fighting the Nazis and fighting for his adopted country.
"On
Saturday, the Daily Mail chose to publish an article about him under the
banner headline 'The Man Who Hated Britain.' It's part of our job
description as politicians to be criticised and attacked by newspapers,
including the Daily Mail. It comes with the territory. The British
people have great wisdom to sort the fair from the unfair. And I have
other ways of answering back.
"But my Dad is a different matter.
He died in 1994. I loved him and he loved Britain. And there is no
credible argument in the article or evidence from his life which can
remotely justify the lurid headline and its accompanying claim that it
would 'disturb everyone who loves this country'."
After defending
his father and his patriotism, he concluded that the Daily Mail article
was of a different order to the normal criticism politicians faced. "I
know they say 'you can't libel the dead' but you can smear them," the
Labour leader wrote.
"Fierce debate about politics does not
justify character assassination of my father, questioning the patriotism
of a man who risked his life for our country in the second world war or
publishing a picture of his gravestone with a tasteless pun about him
being a 'grave socialist'.
"The Daily Mail sometimes claims it
stands for the best of British values of decency. But something has
really gone wrong when it attacks the family of a politician – any
politician – in this way. It would be true of an attack on the father of
David Cameron, Nick Clegg, or mine.
"There was a time when
politicians stayed silent if this kind of thing happened, in the hope
that it wouldn't happen again. And fear that if they spoke out, it would
make things worse. I will not do that. The stakes are too high for our
country for politics to be conducted in this way. We owe it to Britain
to have a debate which reflects the values of how we want the country
run."
Although the Mail published Miliband's piece, it repeated
its original claim and ran an editorial refusing to apologise over what
it called an "evil legacy".
The Labour leader's office responded
to the Mail editorial saying: "Ed Miliband wrote his right to reply
article because he wanted to state clearly that his father loved
Britain.
"He wanted the Daily Mail to treat his late father's
reputation fairly. Rather than acknowledge it has smeared his father,
the newspaper has repeated its original claim. This simply diminishes
the Daily Mail further.
"It will be for people to judge whether
this newspaper's treatment of a war veteran, Jewish refugee from the
Nazis and distinguished academic reflects the values and decency we
should all expect in our political debate."
The row comes at a
sensitive time as the privy council decides this month whether to accept
a royal charter proposed by leading newspaper groups or by the three
main political parties". (Picture of Royal Navy on route to Normandy for D Day 1944)