Showing posts with label Standard Life. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Standard Life. Show all posts

Sunday, March 16, 2014

Fees - and what trustees should know? AMNT Open Day Feb 2014

Final late post from last month's Association of Member Nominated Trustees (AMNT) open meeting on the "Understanding fund structures and their implications - what Trustees should know" presentation.

This was by George Emmerson from Standard Life and Maddi Forrester AXA.

While I enjoyed all the presentations that day and learnt a lot - this was probably the most practical and I have since used the information on fees at trustee meetings.

For pensions trustees the most common the charge you see most is called the Annual Management Charge (or AMC). However the most important figure on fees that Trustees should always ask for is the Total Expenses Ratio (or TER) which should include everything.

I asked the question is it ever appropriate for fund managers to give performance figures GROSS (before) of fees instead of NET of fees? I was told that fund managers when they bid for new business at beauty parades etc have to give their past performance "Gross of fees" but there is no reason why they should not take out their fees from their performance if they are employed as your fund advisers. (make sure that your fund managers mandate states that you want net of fees reporting as well).

So trustees up and down the land make sure you get the TER and performance net of fees. If a fund manager (private equity or hedge fund) say they can't give you specific TER information, then in my view, don't buy from them.

Afterwards George and Maddi held a fun "Acronym Bingo" where they tested the trustees present on our knowledge about what all the weird and wonderful acronyms used by the financial services industry actually mean. My score in this bingo quiz was pretty abysmal while our AMNT Co-Chair Barry Parr took first prize!

Wednesday, August 15, 2012

"Barclay pay AGM vote round-up"

Hat -tip Tom at "Labour & Capital"

"Being the sad man that I am, I've been collecting asset manager voting decisions on Barclays' remuneration report at this year's AGM.

Here are the scores on the doors so far -

FOR - Goldman Sachs, Standard Life
ABSTAIN -
OPPOSE - Aberdeen, AXA, F&C, Investec, JP Morgan, Jupiter, Kames, Legal & General, M&G, Royal London, Scottish Widows

Will update when I get more data. Interesting thing to note is that some hefty UK institutions voted against. So where did all those votes in favour come from?"

(grayee comment: Goldman Sachs Yeah but Wtf is Standard Life doing voting to reward shareholders being ripped off?

Saturday, January 23, 2010

Pensions: Who on earth is looking after our money?


An employer covered by my trade union branch offers a Group Stakeholder Pension scheme with Standard Life. As "Direct Contribution" (DC) schemes go it is pretty good but employees have to join Standard Life to benefit from employer contributions. Recently a union member in this pension scheme came to me with a letter from Standard Life which worried him. This letter explained that the company had recently found out that there had been some mistakes in its marketing literature about their Sterling Fund which as not to their "usual high standards". They offered to move his money into another fund and make up any loses.

You might think “What a decent company Standard Life is for doing this, well done for owing up and doing the right thing”.

It now turns out that Standard Life has just been fined £2.45 million for misleading pensions customers “Insurance firm claimed money would be placed into low-risk fund when it was invested in toxic mortgages” The Guardian .  They were forced to pay and had actually shamefully tried to get out of paying anything beforehand.  They had to pay policy holders in the end over a £100 million in compensation!

While I hope that shareholders will paying for this compensation and the FSA fine (I am sure that the poor old policy holders will pay somehow - I also have a paid up policy with Standard Life) it does call into question who is checking up on Standard Life on behalf of policy holders. Who can not only call to account Standard Life over their marketing material but also question why on earth were they investing in toxic mortgages in a just before you actually retiresafety first fund”?

Most proper pension scheme (defined benefit or defined contributions) have member trustees to do this job. Such Group Pension or insurance schemes don’t have trustees. They can (see here) have “management committees” but they have no teeth or legal status. What we need is a requirement for trust based effective policy holder representation on all pensions’ schemes.

After all, surely we all now know what happens when you get capitalism without any owners?