This will be a great free debate taking place tomorrow at the historic Old Town Hall in Stratford High Street, London E15. It is only 5 minutes walk from Stratford Railway and Bus station and at the back of the Town Hall, in side streets, there is free parking spaces after 6.30pm (check Parking signs !!!).
My own personal blog. Labour & Co-op Cllr, Statutory Deputy Mayor & Cabinet Lead for Housing, UNISON NEC member for Community, Branch Secretary, London Regional Council Officer & Chair of its Labour Link Committee. Newham Cllr for West Ham Ward, Vice Chair of Local Authority Pension Fund Forum, Pension trustee, Housing & Safety Practitioner. Centre left and proud member of the Labour movement family. Strictly no trolls please.
Wednesday, January 15, 2014
Tuesday, January 14, 2014
Le Vieux Cordelier 2014 by Nick
"I was amazed to witness an outburst by our great leader of men, and women, at the BC today. He was clearly upset about 2 motions submited by two branch committee members which want to amend the rules of Lambeth Unison. They have every right to do this. I don't think the motions will get two thirds majority nor will members at AGM be very interested in the content. But that does not mean the people who have submitted these motions are right wing or reactionary? I would be happy to leave the argument there but since Jon of the Rogers has also had an outburst on his blog I thought I would respond in kind. Or is he trying to get attention for himself..? I wonder..
Nick Venedi"
Ryanair Robbing Pensioners (and pension peril of zero hour contracts)
According to the FT controversial airline Ryanair is closing its Pension fund for staff in Ireland and
transferring their accrued defined benefit pension scheme benefits to a defined contribution scheme - in which future benefits will depend on investment performance???
Not only are they doing this to active (current) members but also to former staff who have left their pension with the scheme.
Does this mean that staff who were promised a guaranteed pension will now have to face the uncertainties of the investment market? Why did the trustees agree to this?
Yet I understand that many of the new Ryanair staff can't even join the DC scheme as they are 'self employed' on zero hour type contracts!
So it seems that all staff in Ryanair former, past and future will be stuffed.
Except I believe its senior management.
No surprise there!
Hat tip Pension Biggles
Not only are they doing this to active (current) members but also to former staff who have left their pension with the scheme.
Does this mean that staff who were promised a guaranteed pension will now have to face the uncertainties of the investment market? Why did the trustees agree to this?
Yet I understand that many of the new Ryanair staff can't even join the DC scheme as they are 'self employed' on zero hour type contracts!
So it seems that all staff in Ryanair former, past and future will be stuffed.
Except I believe its senior management.
No surprise there!
Hat tip Pension Biggles
Monday, January 13, 2014
CRATUPEAR!
CRATUPEAR is the acronym of the "The Collective Redundancies and Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 2014" which comes in force on 31st January 2014.
Hat tip to Daniel Barnett Employment law bulletin for this information and the summary of the changes below. The Tories have tried to water down employment protection for workers but it seems to me they are making TUPE even more complex, confusing and potentially litigious than ever.
"The summary below of what the government is not changing is probably as important as what it is changing. The main changes which the government is proceeding with are amending the TUPE Regulations to:-
allow renegotiation of terms agreed from collective agreements one year after transfer, provided any changes are no less favourable to employees,
the location of a workforce can be within the scope of an economic, technical or organisational reason entailing changes in the workforce, thus preventing genuine place of work redundancies from being automatically unfair.
clarify that for there to be a TUPE service provision change, the service provision must be "fundamentally or essentially the same" as before the transfer
allowing microbusinesses to inform and consult directly with employees (in some circumstances) allowing TUPE consultation to satisfy collective redundancy consultation rules.
Importantly, the government is not:- removing 'service provision change' from what amounts to a TUPE transfer removing the transferor's obligation to provide employee liability information; rather, the time for providing such information is increased to 28 days.
Also mentioned is the extension of the right to request flexible working to all employees with 26 weeks' service, which will come into force on 6th April 2014".
Hat tip to Daniel Barnett Employment law bulletin for this information and the summary of the changes below. The Tories have tried to water down employment protection for workers but it seems to me they are making TUPE even more complex, confusing and potentially litigious than ever.
"The summary below of what the government is not changing is probably as important as what it is changing. The main changes which the government is proceeding with are amending the TUPE Regulations to:-
allow renegotiation of terms agreed from collective agreements one year after transfer, provided any changes are no less favourable to employees,
the location of a workforce can be within the scope of an economic, technical or organisational reason entailing changes in the workforce, thus preventing genuine place of work redundancies from being automatically unfair.
clarify that for there to be a TUPE service provision change, the service provision must be "fundamentally or essentially the same" as before the transfer
allowing microbusinesses to inform and consult directly with employees (in some circumstances) allowing TUPE consultation to satisfy collective redundancy consultation rules.
Importantly, the government is not:- removing 'service provision change' from what amounts to a TUPE transfer removing the transferor's obligation to provide employee liability information; rather, the time for providing such information is increased to 28 days.
Also mentioned is the extension of the right to request flexible working to all employees with 26 weeks' service, which will come into force on 6th April 2014".
Sunday, January 12, 2014
Private Thomas Highgate - the First to be Shot at Dawn
I think people know that on the 28 July this year it will be the 100th anniversary of the start of the First World War. Not many will know that within a few weeks the first British soldier had been shot by firing squad for desertion.
This morning I was looking for a Sunday walk in the country and picked this 7 mile circular route starting in Shoreham, Kent.
Before I left I checked google for Shoreham and on Wikipedia found this "Shoreham was the birthplace and home of Private Thomas Highgate, who was the first British soldier to be shot for desertion during the First World War on 8 September 1914, following the Battle of and Retreat from Mons. In 2000, Shoreham Parish Council voted not to include his name on its war memorial. However, after a posthumous pardon in 2006, it was considered that his name might be added.[1]"#
I wondered if 19 year old Thomas's (see picture above) name had indeed been added to the War memorial and decided at the end of the walk to have a look.
The walk itself was wonderful (click for photos) and I would recommend it. Lots of up and down hills with great views and different scenery. You go past the historic Roman villa and Castle at Lullingstone. The only significant downside being some noise from nearby (but very largely unseen) motorway.
At the War Memorial near the old village bridge there was no sign of his name on it. I have since found out via the Internet that the issue has been hugely controversial in the village. It appears that 2 (or 3) of his brothers were later killed in the War but also that Thomas had deserted once before while in the (peace time) Army and had been imprisoned for 42 days. It is reported also that Thomas had no witnesses for his defence at his trial for desertion since the rest of his unit were killed in the Battle.
I think that this is at the end of the day a matter for the local community and no-one else.
I will say that on the way out of the village I noticed 3 local teenage boys sitting on a wall near the village shop, probably aged about 15, looking bored and fed up as only adolescent boys can be. They were only a couple of years younger at most than Thomas was when he joined the Army at 17. I do wonder how they would have dealt with the aftermath following the carnage at the Battle of Mons?
UPDATE: BBC report 31 May 2014
This morning I was looking for a Sunday walk in the country and picked this 7 mile circular route starting in Shoreham, Kent.
Before I left I checked google for Shoreham and on Wikipedia found this "Shoreham was the birthplace and home of Private Thomas Highgate, who was the first British soldier to be shot for desertion during the First World War on 8 September 1914, following the Battle of and Retreat from Mons. In 2000, Shoreham Parish Council voted not to include his name on its war memorial. However, after a posthumous pardon in 2006, it was considered that his name might be added.[1]"#
I wondered if 19 year old Thomas's (see picture above) name had indeed been added to the War memorial and decided at the end of the walk to have a look.
The walk itself was wonderful (click for photos) and I would recommend it. Lots of up and down hills with great views and different scenery. You go past the historic Roman villa and Castle at Lullingstone. The only significant downside being some noise from nearby (but very largely unseen) motorway.
At the War Memorial near the old village bridge there was no sign of his name on it. I have since found out via the Internet that the issue has been hugely controversial in the village. It appears that 2 (or 3) of his brothers were later killed in the War but also that Thomas had deserted once before while in the (peace time) Army and had been imprisoned for 42 days. It is reported also that Thomas had no witnesses for his defence at his trial for desertion since the rest of his unit were killed in the Battle.
I think that this is at the end of the day a matter for the local community and no-one else.
I will say that on the way out of the village I noticed 3 local teenage boys sitting on a wall near the village shop, probably aged about 15, looking bored and fed up as only adolescent boys can be. They were only a couple of years younger at most than Thomas was when he joined the Army at 17. I do wonder how they would have dealt with the aftermath following the carnage at the Battle of Mons?
UPDATE: BBC report 31 May 2014
UPDATE: visit 2020 John's Labour blog: Private Thomas Highgate - the First to be Shot at Dawn (2020 update) (johnslabourblog.org)
Saturday, January 11, 2014
West Ham "on the knocker" in Thurrock for "Cost of Cameron" Day.
Today was a busy #CostofCameron day for West Ham Labour Party and other activists up and down the Country.
The Party targeted 106 marginal seats nationally and we locally went out to help comrades in our sister CLP in Thurrock, Essex. The aim of this campaign day is to speak to voters about why they are suffering a cut in their income due to this Tory Cost of Living Crisis. Unlike (my view - see link) the "Fat Cat Executives" whose money has gone up and up at our expense.
Beforehand there had been a canvassing training session organised by West Ham Women's Forum. I had my ward surgery then at 11.30 (ish) 15 of us drove to Thurrock (others made their way by train).
The weather was glorious, perfect for being "on the knocker" - blue skies and thankfully dry. We divided into 3 teams and I was with John Whitworth, Charlene McLean and Gordon Miller. Our MP Lyn Brown and local candidate Polly Billington led another team together with Thurrock activists.
Our reception was pretty good. A little different than canvassing in West Ham with its largely rock solid labour support but on the whole residents were pretty cheerful and even seemed to be pleased to see us! Even the odd Tories we came across!
The ward we were canvassing is currently Tory and based on previous experiences of campaigning out of London over the years I thought that we did pretty well. It was only one afternoon but I do think that even traditional Tory supporters, who are feeling the pain of year after year of pay cuts are starting to twig that a government that only delivers for the rich and not ordinary working families is frankly not worth supporting.
I am more and more convinced that 2015 is going to be about "the economy stupid" and while the NHS, Housing and Education will be important the Party that can persuade voters that they can put more money into their pockets and purses is going to win.
Hat tip ace photographer Gordon.
The Party targeted 106 marginal seats nationally and we locally went out to help comrades in our sister CLP in Thurrock, Essex. The aim of this campaign day is to speak to voters about why they are suffering a cut in their income due to this Tory Cost of Living Crisis. Unlike (my view - see link) the "Fat Cat Executives" whose money has gone up and up at our expense.
Beforehand there had been a canvassing training session organised by West Ham Women's Forum. I had my ward surgery then at 11.30 (ish) 15 of us drove to Thurrock (others made their way by train).
The weather was glorious, perfect for being "on the knocker" - blue skies and thankfully dry. We divided into 3 teams and I was with John Whitworth, Charlene McLean and Gordon Miller. Our MP Lyn Brown and local candidate Polly Billington led another team together with Thurrock activists.
Our reception was pretty good. A little different than canvassing in West Ham with its largely rock solid labour support but on the whole residents were pretty cheerful and even seemed to be pleased to see us! Even the odd Tories we came across!
The ward we were canvassing is currently Tory and based on previous experiences of campaigning out of London over the years I thought that we did pretty well. It was only one afternoon but I do think that even traditional Tory supporters, who are feeling the pain of year after year of pay cuts are starting to twig that a government that only delivers for the rich and not ordinary working families is frankly not worth supporting.
I am more and more convinced that 2015 is going to be about "the economy stupid" and while the NHS, Housing and Education will be important the Party that can persuade voters that they can put more money into their pockets and purses is going to win.
Hat tip ace photographer Gordon.
Friday, January 10, 2014
Financial Reporting Council "Why we are too lazy and owners too stupid to vote in pooled pension funds"
The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) is a well known "mates club" of financial services industry representatives pretending to be a UK independent regulator on corporate governance and investment.
Top Finance blogger Tom P at "Labour and Capital" comments on the latest FRC report that dismisses attempts by pension schemes who invest in pooled funds to be able to vote on their shareholding.
As Tom points out there is no good reason for this not happening whatsoever. The only reasons I can see is that most (not all) asset managers are just too lazy to arrange this and think that asset owners are too stupid to be able to vote.
I am also forced to conclude that the FRC doesn't want pesky share owners to be able to vote because they may have the blooming cheek to vote down their mates obscene (and growing) executive pay and other super generous perks.
Top Finance blogger Tom P at "Labour and Capital" comments on the latest FRC report that dismisses attempts by pension schemes who invest in pooled funds to be able to vote on their shareholding.
As Tom points out there is no good reason for this not happening whatsoever. The only reasons I can see is that most (not all) asset managers are just too lazy to arrange this and think that asset owners are too stupid to be able to vote.
I am also forced to conclude that the FRC doesn't want pesky share owners to be able to vote because they may have the blooming cheek to vote down their mates obscene (and growing) executive pay and other super generous perks.
Thursday, January 09, 2014
"Fat Cat Wednesday"
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/01/07/workers-pay_n_4555778.html?utm_hp_ref=tw
The High Pay Centre think tank said chief executives in the FTSE 100 were paid an average of almost £4.3 million in 2012, equivalent to an hourly wage of well over £1,000, compared with the country's average annual wage of £26,000.
Executive pay has increased by 74% over the past decade, while wages for ordinary workers have remained "flat", the study found. Company bosses who returned to work on Monday after the festive break will have made more money in 2014 by mid-morning today than the annual salary of average workers, said the report.
UNISON Comment: Our pension funds should be voting NO to these outrageous pay deals at the company AGMs!"
Hat tip UNISON Capital Steward website
The High Pay Centre think tank said chief executives in the FTSE 100 were paid an average of almost £4.3 million in 2012, equivalent to an hourly wage of well over £1,000, compared with the country's average annual wage of £26,000.
Executive pay has increased by 74% over the past decade, while wages for ordinary workers have remained "flat", the study found. Company bosses who returned to work on Monday after the festive break will have made more money in 2014 by mid-morning today than the annual salary of average workers, said the report.
UNISON Comment: Our pension funds should be voting NO to these outrageous pay deals at the company AGMs!"
Hat tip UNISON Capital Steward website
"Please come and have a DRINK!! with me"
I got this odd email invite the other day. Too busy doing union stuff to attend. : "For a new squabbling and democratic centralist disunted left?
To: "Dave Bala<d.bala@trotsrus.co.uk>
Wednesday, January 08, 2014
Cost of Cameron Saturday
This Saturday 11 January 2014 Labour activists will launch the "Cost of Cameron" day across 106 key marginal seats. West Ham will helping out its sister CLP in Thurrock, Essex with our MP, Lyn Brown.I am always amazed that British people are not more angry about the huge loss of pay they have suffered under this Tory led coalition government. While at the same time the rich have got even richer?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



