Leadership Election – Join the Labour Party: Get a Vote!

Quick post on the email no doubt many of us received today from Peter Watt, the Labour Party General Secretary, urging us to encourage Labour Party supporters to join the Party by June 1 and still get a vote for the Labour Party Leadership and Deputy Leadership.

By co-incidence, I spoke today to a GMB steward who lives in West Ham (my CLP). I asked him if he was a member of the Party. He said no, he gave some reasons why – including the cost! When I told him that trade union members can pay £1 per month he was astonished and said he would consider joining.

Now, if you can afford it, I would encourage everyone to pay the proper rate of £3 per month to join the Party (just over the cost of one pint of Stella in London – sorry I have been too long in the “Smoke” and I’m now a confirmed lager drinker). The literature does not make it particularly clear however, that the “reduced rate" for Labour Party membership also includes trade unionists as well as “unwaged”. There is a mass of trade union members who already pay a voluntary excess on their subs to the Party , who are probably not going to be very active in the Party, but are willing to join the Party (at £12 per year) to show support.

Interesting that the Party is doing this push. Some might think that there should have been a “cut off” point for eligibility to vote. Like there is for elections for prospective parliamentary candidates. Having a vote will be useful for CLP membership secretaries to use to chase "lapsed" members into paying their dues.

I understand from a few “Left” blogs that several thousand “Marxists” (inverted comma’s - sorry can’t find a source, but I have seen it I think on the socialist unity sites? - honest) deliberately joined the Labour Party solely to vote for Tony Benn to be deputy leader in 1981. Didn’t do him much good but I assume the Party enjoyed the subs.

Maybe it would be an idea to make it clear that a percentage of subs from new members are used to pay for a “thank you” party for Tony Blair? (Joke)

And while you are at it - join a trade union! If you work in public services then you must join UNISON (and make sure you tick the “Labour Link” aka “Applied Political Fund” levy box - you have until May 16 to get a levy vote). If you don’t work in Public services then check out the TUC "Work Smart" – Union finder site. Try to join a Labour Party affiliated site if at all possible. Check out TULO to find affiliated unions.

Finally, check out the stuff you can buy to mark the 2007 leadership election (see photos above)!

2nd East London meeting arranged for Deputy Leader Candidates

The 2nd East London event for members to meet the candidates will take place on 8pm Tuesday 29 May 2007. Alan Johnson, Hazel Blears and Peter Hain (tbc) will be attending. (1st meeting with Hilary Benn, Jon Cruddas and Harriet Harman takes place on the 23 May).

This has been organised by West Ham Labour Party and Lyn Brown MP (sponsored by London UNISON Labour Link).

Both events will be taking place at Sarah Bonnell School, Deanery Rd, Stratford, E15 4LP. Only 8 minutes walk from Stratford Bus and Train Station (free street car parking nearby)

Neighbouring Constituency Labour Party’s will be invited. Labour Party members and trade union levy paying affiliates only.

For further information contact John Whitworth (CLP Education Officer) jhnwhitworth@Yahoo.co.uk 020 8257 9587 or Alan Griffiths (CLP Secretary) alangriffiths_per@yahoo.co.uk 07773 884339

Striking over Safety

Strange, last month the “Daily Hate” launched a typically sensationalist attack upon the Health and Safety Executive “nanny state gone absolutely bonkers” et al. In this Jackanory they referred to a largely made up non-story about Tower Hamlets Council “banning staff from putting up Christmas decorations and lights in case they got hurt”.

In the real world, UNISON and GMB safety reps have actually been trying to persuade the Council not to remove safety screens, from the reception desks in the newly refurbished “Homeless Persons Unit” (HPU). The HPU assesses people to see if they are eligible to be rehoused by the council, if they are “homeless” and “vulnerable”. The vast majority of applicants are perfectly decent who are not any threat to staff. However, there is a small minority of homeless applicants (or their friends and family) who can be extremely violent and threatening. Management say that they want to improve the “customer environment” for users and that screens can even provoke violence. Everyone wants to work and provide quality services in clean, bright and modern offices but not at the expense of safety.

The HPU has always had security screens because of the potential risk. In the past screens were removed from local housing offices and “One Stop Shop’s”. However, they had to be reinstalled after a series of assaults and attacks on staff. One of our members on reception was punched in the head and knocked to the floor. She was severally injured and off sick for several months. In another incident a man with an axe jumped over a counter. Staff managed to retreat into a lockable room while he smashed up the office with his axe.

When I last posted on this issue staff had just voted to carry out an indicative strike ballot. In a meeting on Thursday, the results came back from UNISON members, 44 in favour of strike action and 5 against. So we will go for an official ballot. Members at the meeting also voted to support anyone who does not feel safe enough to work on an open reception and in favour of a protest (see picture) on Monday 21 May, when the new unit is due to open. Further details to follow.

On Wednesday 16 May UNISON has employed the respected health and safety specialist, Mick Holder, (member of IOSH) from the London Hazards Centre (LHC) to carry out an inspection of the new office. If management won’t pay any attention to what the people who carry out the job think then perhaps they might take notice of him and start thinking outside the box.

Another irony is that in recent years, the Council has built a number of “Idea Store’s” which manage Adult learning and Libraries services for the borough. These Stores have been very poplar. However, due to violent attacks and hooliganism, they have been forced to employ licensed doormen as security guards. I have spoken to these guards, many of whom are ex-military, who after their shift at an “idea store” go on to work at night clubs wearing body armour. So we have the ridiculous situation that licensed security guards are employed to protect library staff while the HPU will just have untrained “customer service assistants” (who have been told they are really “meeters and greeters”) to protect them.

Goodbye to all That? Tony Blair PM – A Personal Perspective

I know that you are not supposed to view politics from your own personal or family perspective, however, my politics are personal and based upon my own upbringing and life experiences. I suspect that in reality everyone shares this view.

So, what has been some of my personal and family perspectives on Tony Blair successes and failures during his time as Prime Minister? This is a short snap shot. Perhaps I could expand it to wider issues such as constitutional matters, gay rights, employment, mortgages, Northern Ireland, Trade union rights, Warwick or foreign policy? I’ll start with my Mum, brother-in-law and niece.

I think that the major achievement of Blair (and Brown) for my family has been pension credit. My mother is totally dependant upon her state pension. She (like most people) never had a chance to join a company pension scheme. The massive increase in her pension under Labour has made a huge difference to her life. Pounds in pockets. Easy to mock this if you already have them.

She lives in a very nice EPD (Elderly Persons Dwelling – which ironically used to be her primary school when she was little). She is the tenant of a Housing Association which was newly built about 7 years ago. A Blair government may have provided the money to build her flat, but she would rather have rented from the Council. She does not think that she has a personal “relationship” with her landlord in the same way her mother had with the Council. Blair has refused to allow Councils to build new properties and effectively tried to force them to transfer their stock to Housing associations.

My elder sister is married to a self-employed “lagger”. He drives a “white (-ish) van” very carefully. He provides and fits (usually by himself) insulation to commercial central heating and hot water systems. Most of his work is in the public sector as a sub-contractor to refurbishment or new build fire stations, hospitals, schools etc. He works bloody hard. It is a often, dirty physical work with no long term security. He refuses to declare who he votes for (I can guess). However, he accepts that under Blair he has never had so much work, due to massive investment in public services. Even though he also moans that he now has to pay far more in income tax. He is worried about his pension and what would happen to him if he was to fall sick or have an accident.

One of my nieces is now 21 and works as a shop assistant. She lives in an area where wages are traditionally very low. Blair may have done little to change the structural economic problems in that region; however, what he and his government have done is to introduce the national minimum wage (and 20 days’ annual holidays). Her money and working conditions may still be poor; however, the minimum wages has made a huge difference to her life. Pounds in pockets. She may have no pension (or sick company pay) at the moment, but the proposed Pension Personal accounts should help her start protecting her future.
Shall I go on?

“Protecting Future Pensions”: Conference for Trade Union Pension Trustees/Reps

The annual TUC “Trustee Network” Conference takes place on Friday 22 June 2007 at the Cass Business School, London, EC1Y. Keynote speakers are James Purnell MP, Minister of State for Pensions Reform (who took my photo with Tom and Nick Cohen last month), Paul Myners, Chairman, Guardian PLC and Chair, Low Pay Commission (my pension fund sacked him and his company, Gartmore, as its fund manager in 1994 – something he describes as the “worse day in his life” – a Joke BTW) and Brendan Barber, TUC General Secretary (photo with UNISON London region last week).

Seriously, this is the only Trade Union national meeting of member nominated trustees/representatives on pension schemes. Ordinary workers in this country actually own huge chunks of British and international capital via our pension schemes, life insurance policies and other collective investments (such as PEP’s, unit trusts, investment trusts). However, often we have little or even no influence over how this money is governed. Pensions are just deferred wages. We should be exercising our rights of ownership (as well as taking responsibility for what is done in our name).

The pressure group “Fair Pensions” describes how some of our money “is invested in companies that are attacking employees’ rights and fighting attempts to unionise. This can include the use of militias against trade unionists in South America to “Union-busting” in the UK. We need to use our investments to change some companies’ behaviour. Pension funds own almost a fifth of the stock market, but the vast majority of funds - including some that offer “ethical” options – make no effort to challenge this behaviour.

Responsibly-invested pension funds are already putting Wal-Mart under heavy pressure over its labour practices in the United States. In the UK, pension funds have successfully lobbied drug manufacturers to lower the cost of HIV treatments for southern Africa and persuaded companies to start tackling climate change.

Responsible investment is about using shareholder power to improve company behaviour, rather than avoiding certain industries, so it does not lower returns, and can improve financial performance by identifying the potential cost of corporate strategies that ignore legal, reputational and other risks”.

If you want an agenda and booking form contact Jayne Cranefield on 020 7467 1225 jcranefield@tuc.org.uk (normally a bit pricy – make sure that your pension fund or union pays). If you have a “funded” pension scheme (has actually investments rather than “pay as you go” UNISON and the TUC are running courses on pensions), check to see if you could be a member nominated trustee/representative. If you are already a trustee join the network

UPDATE: Download entry form from TUC

Strangers into Citizens

Strangers into Citizens is the latest campaign by the London Citizens (LC) which is an alliance of community and faith groups in London. The aim is to find a “Pathway into citizenship for long-term migrants who have made new lives in the UK”. To-day was a national day of action. There was a mass at Westminster Cathedral led by Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor (head of the Roman Catholic Church in Britain). Followed by a “Walk” (March) from the Cathedral to Trafalgar Square. At Trafalgar Square there was a rally.

Dave Prentis, the UNISON General Secretary helped lead the march and was a speaker at the rally. This campaign is obviously a key trade union issue. Public services in Britain depend upon migrants. Unscrupulous companies employ migrants whose status may be irregular and then take advantage of this to exploit them by paying poverty wages or providing shoddy working conditions. If the migrants complain then the employers simply threaten to report them to the authorities. Dave mentioned the plight of “legal” Philippine nurses in British care homes who had their passports confiscated by their employers, who were not paid what they had been promised and were treated appallingly.

The new Greater London UNISON banner was there together with banners from Tower Hamlets and School of Oriental Studies (SOAS). There was a mass of individual UNISON members waving flags and placards.

I had never been inside the Cathedral before and apart from weddings (and funerals) I had never been to a formal Catholic service. I was christened as a baby at the local Church of Wales (protestant) which is pretty much my entire experience of organised religion. The Cathedral was packed, standing room only. London Citizens certainly know how to attract people to attend their campaigns. I enjoyed the music and the spectacle of the service.

The march and rally was also well attended and colourful. Despite the rain (The LC marches don’t have a lot of luck with the weather – discuss). The whole of Whitehall was full. I am not sure how many took part (guess several thousand) but it is far more than the May Day March last week. I have attended other LC events such as the call for a “Living Wage”. But this was the biggest and most well attended.

I think it is fair to say that there is a degree of reserve by many on the “Left” about London Citizens. Obviously the role of the faith groups in secular politics can be controversial (it came up yesterday at the mosque). Sometimes London Citizens has been criticised over their methods (too "confrontational" and even for being "opportunistic"). However, they can mobilise and organise large numbers of people to turn out and successfully campaign on basic Labour movement issues that should unite us all. The trade unions (and the Labour Party) need to work out how to respond to this.

Islam TV “Question time” with Muslim Friends of Labour

This afternoon I was invited to attend the Newham Launch of “Muslim Friends of Labour” (MFL) at Minhaj Ul-Qur'an International Mosque, Forest Gate, London E7. Cabinet Minster and local MP, Stephen Timms, Chief Secretary Treasury, was the guest speaker.

Firstly, there was a series of speeches. Stephen (see picture) spoke on the “The importance of Muslim engagement in local politics”. He reflected on the harm caused by the Iraq War to the relationship between the Labour Party and the Muslim community. However, he pointed out that the recent Council elections, although not brilliant for Labour, showed that extremist fringe groups such as Respect were a “spent force” and that the Labour Party, was the only natural home of Muslims in Britain.

Dr Zulfikar Ali (Chair of MFL and local Cllr) spoke on the” advantages of engagement". As someone who was very much opposed to the war, he did recognise the support Labour had given the Muslim community and that while surveys had shown that Muslims were committed to Britishness (far more than other new communities) their needs have to be recognised by society .

Shiraz Ahmed spoke on the vision and goals of MFL. He gave a very personal speech about what it is like to grow up in East London as a British Muslim. Also, that being on the political fringe doesn’t change anything; you have to belong to the mainstream. He thought that MFL could help bridge the gap between grassroots Muslim opinion and the Labour Party.

An extremely eloquent speaker (whose name I did not catch) spoke on behalf of Lyn Brown MP, who had to give her apologies. Lyn’s speech concentrated on how the key Labour Party values of Social Justice, Equity and Equality are reflected in Islamic values. Despite the “elephant in the room” (Iraq) no other Party has done so much for Muslim communities.

So far pretty interesting stuff, next Islam TV had organised a “Question Time” debate. The panel was Stephen, Zulfikar and Clive Furnace (local Cllr and a founder member of the campaign against repression and for democratic rights in Iraq (Cardri) who visited Iraqi Kurdistan several times in the 90s). BEN TV a poplar African cable station was also filming.

I could go on about the Q&A, but what I found really inspiring is that people were gathered together talking about emotive and divisive issues such as Iraq, Faith schools, Labour Party foreign policy and how to prevent Muslim youths being attracted to extremists in a wide ranging, intelligent, polite and informative debate. It was interesting that this discussion took place in Forest Gate, only 10 minutes walk away from the potentially disastrous Police raid and shooting last year. I think things are moving on.

Apparently the debate will be shown on Wednesday 9 May (channel 813 on Sky - Free) Islam TV.

Tories lose control of Thurrock and BNP go nowhere

Update: Great news from Thurrock – The Tories lost overall control of the Council and the BNP were given a good “kicking” (in the democratic sense of the word - even though retired members of Red Action may have been about). The BBC quoted Nazi Griffin (BNP leader) as claiming that they were expecting to take seats in Thurrock. Wrong. There may have been only two Labour gains, but it meant that the Tories lost overall control of the Council. Make's up a bit for the not particularly positive night for Labour. However, we did increase our national vote by 1%!

I was pleased that the ward that the West Ham team spent most time on “West Thurrock and South Stifford”, the Labour candidate, Julieann Burkey, thrashed the BNP 676 votes to 478. Last time the BNP came within 18 votes. Well done Julieann.

In the other ward we worked “Ockendon” the Labour candidate, Oliver Gerrish, only lost to the Tories by 13 votes (741 Tories 728 Labour). If I hadn’t got lost and took us over the QE bridge into Kent, would we been able to do one more “knock up” and get those votes? I blame the map reader! (typical, bloody campaign group supporters, they know what they want but can’t work out a way to get there!)

Although London Labour members (there is no election in London this year) obviously played their part, as I posted last night, the real credit for their success must lie with the local Thurrock Labour Party and the hard work that must have gone on well before 3 May. The local members had that familiar sleep deprived “walking dead” look (a compliment in these circumstances). The canvassing returns were pretty accurate, we didn’t have to hang around or wait to be sent out, their election leaflets were good and the Party members seemed to work well as a team (no obvious internal bickering, no temper tantrums et al). No doubt there will be lessons to be learnt. However, “Hats off” to Thurrock.

My view of the overall national result is that 485 loses is nothing to go on about, however, I was encouraged by the support that Labour enjoyed even in these admittedly difficult times. So if we have an electable leader (and deputy?) who can run an effective political campaign, keep the economy stable, who can show they have learnt from the mistakes of the past, then Labour should win, big time.

London Labour helps out in Thurrock against Tories/BNP

Back home from Thurrock, Essex (admittedly via a local pub!) where a number of us from West Ham CLP and Tower Hamlets (and Islington, Hackney, Barking & Dagenham and more) went to try and help the local Party defeat the ruling Tory Council administration and see off a BNP (fascist) challenge – who were standing in every ward. London does not have any elections this year. London region Labour Party had sent us an email requesting assistance.

Thurrock is probably best known in London for its shopping centre “Lakeside”. However, this was the first time I had visited the area properly. Parts of it were very green and rural while other parts were built up and industrialised – it reminded me of Barking and Dagenham. Especially the riverside area (Thames).

We mostly spent all day “knocking up” voters who had previously been identified as possible Labour Party supporters. I don’t know what the result is but the canvassing had been pretty accurate (which is not always true in elections) and the people we spoke to were usually solid Labour. However, the people we called at who were “unidentified” (i.e. no-one had managed to speak to them about their voting intentions beforehand) were also on the whole very positive for Labour. This is in a ward that Labour last time only beat the BNP by 18 votes. One of the two, who told me today he was BNP, was so drunk that I actually doubted he would ever make it to the polling station.

Some of the Council estates (I think they were still in-house) reminded me of the inner city London housing estates I work in, even thought we are 45 minutes east of Stratford, E15. The local accent on the estates (particularly amongst the kids) was also to my mind pure “East End”.
The local Labour Party and their MP, Andrew MacKinkley, treated us as kings! Very friendly, very hospitable and they were organised! Andrew (ex-NALGO officer) took us around in the morning and really looked after us. There was no “hanging about” waiting to be told what to do, the paperwork was complete and up-to-date, and there was no public arguments amongst local officials about what we should do! They supplied Bottled water, juice, Tea, Coffee, biscuits, sausages, pizza and encouragement. This meant we were even more motivated to get out and help out.

Things didn’t always go to plan. I took a wrong turning and we ended up on the M25 and had to go over the Queen Elizabeth Bridge into Kent and back again via the tunnel into Essex (£2 toll). Still, we were flying the Labour Party flag from my car (supplied by UNISON Labour Link)

Deputy leadership candidate Jon Cruddas MP turned up (didn’t see him). London Assembly member John Biggs was very active.

The picture is a bit self indulgent. Our final canvass was at this very traditional council estate in Purfleet, just next to the Thames. A ferry went by and if you click on the photo you can see Canary wharf in the distance. Pictured are West Ham CLP Richard Bolt, John Saunders and Judith Garfield (Newham Councillor).

Also with us on the day (apologies to anyone I have missed out) was Bill Turner (UNISON and Tower Hamlets Councillor). Marc Francis and Ohid Ahmed (Tower Hamlets Councillors) and Emily Thornberry MP (Islington South & Finsbury and team).

Don’t know what is going to happen. Off to bed since I have to represent a member at a gross misconduct hearing tomorrow but BBC Nick Robinson blog suggests that results may not be as bad for Labour as suggested!

A May Day Evening with Ken

Last night after the march I went to the annual trade union, May Day reception, laid on by London Mayor, Ken Livingston, at City Hall, SE1. It was held in the “London Living Room” which is on the 9th floor of City Hall. It has brilliant views over central London and the Thames. There is an open air balcony and you can see for miles.

The place was packed (200 odd?) with the great and good of TIGMOO. Ken lived up to his reputation of being a good host, lots of lovely grub and a drink or two. There was a good presence from London UNISON (See picture with TUC General Secretary Brendan Barber).

Ken gave a speech first. Concentrating about the London Assembly elections next year (2008), the threat from the BNP and the lies that they tell (e.g. during the local council elections last year in Barking, the BNP spread the lie that Ken was giving £50,000 to every African who wanted to move to that area). He made a good point that there is a lot of cynicism amongst the public about what “politicians” say (I would agree to a point). However, many people will trust what their trade union and shop steward says. So if the union tells its members, don’t believe the rubbish that the fascists are putting out, members are more likely to pay attention. I think this is largely true.

Brendan gave a thought provoking speech about the role of trade unions and the way we have to adapt to our modern day society. Which I suppose was a lead to Tony Woodley, Joint Secretary of the brand new union UNITE which was born on May 1. UNITE merges the Transport & General (I use to be a member and shop steward) and Amicus (I also use to be a member). UNITE is now probably the biggest trade union in the UK. Tony is a fluent and natural speaker. You could see him even now as the former convenor in Vauxhall’s car plant, Ellesmere Port (which use to be a major employer where I grew up). It was interesting that he expressed regret that Ken was no longer a MP, since he would have had his support as a candidate to be the Labour Leader! Ken’s face beamed unabashed. However, I am certain he must play the game “what if” from time to time (don’t we all).

Due to UNITE, there are various rumours about what UNISON and the GMB will do in response. I teased the GMB Tower Hamlets branch secretary yesterday that UNISON and the GMB were about to merge. He replied “never in my life time, never in my life time!” He’s like me, a young chap (okay, okay – mid 40’s is now young). Maybe so. However, I do not expect there to be a stand alone “GMB” or “UNISON” in 5 years time. We live in interesting times. Why can’t we have single industry/service unions?

All in all, an excellent end to an excellent day. Tomorrow morning (taken day off), I am off with a car load of East London comrades to Thurrock, Essex to help out in the election. Good practice, since the BNP are standing in all their wards.

Good luck to all Labour candidates tomorrow.