
I fully support this in principal because I have come across managers in the past who have made it clear that they consider health & safety failures are the companies’ liability not their personal concern. They were just not interested and considered other issues more important.
When I mentioned the personal liability for fines to a very experienced UNISON rep she admitted that was also unaware of this but she responded by saying “that means managers risk losing their own homes”.
Which I hadn’t thought of before and is of course true and in public services this will also mean that the managers will also probably be UNISON members as well. We need to get the message over that Health & Safety issues are vital and an absolute priority. It should not be ignored or sidelined. Often (not always) junior managers are pressured by more senior management to take risks with staff safety and not fully comply with the law. This must stop and at all levels everyone should realise the consequences of failing to protect those you have a duty of care to look after.
Of course, working in public housing, I am a firm believer in the philosophy that if it can go wrong – eventually - it will.
Do I read you correctly?
ReplyDeleteManagers losing their homes for professional mistakes, against which risk they cannot insure and the only reason you oppose this is that they might be Unison members.
This happening to someone in the private sector would of course be a "fat-cat" getting his comeuppance?
Is that what you're saying?
Hi Jackart
ReplyDeleteWe are talking about criminal activity not just “professional mistakes” and yes I am worried about junior managers (regardless of sector) being scapegoated for senior management cock-ups and disinterest. It happens.